L’écriture Féminine: Hipparchia

Featured

Screen Shot 2013-05-31 at 1.21.36 PMA voice leaps out at me from the page.

I’ve found it written four different ways:

“I have used for the getting of knowledge all the time which, because of my sex, I was supposed to waste at the loom.” — Hipparchia

“But don’t suppose for a moment that I regret the time I spend improving my mind instead of squatting by a loom.” — Hipparchia

“But do you imagine that I have not taken proper thought about myself, If the time I might have spent on the loom I have devoted to my education?” — Hipparchia

“But do I appear to you to have come to a wrong decision, if I devote that time to philosophy, which I otherwise should have spent at the loom?” — Hipparchia

***

Each version, adding up to a spirit I’ve been long overdue to find.

I align myself with her.

I copy these lines, repetitively.

Writing her words everywhere, anywhere there’s space.

But to write about her, using words of my own?

I think back to Frede’s essay: He tells me to historically contextualize: So I do: Conditions for women.

What were they like?

She lived around the fourth or third century BC.

A footnote serves as my own “eternal return” to the inferiority of my sex at that time:

“It was axiomatic in the ancient Greek world that men were superior to women”(19).

Hipparchia renounced a life of wealth and security in order to follow her heart. She refused to live any other kind of life, except the one she wanted. Strong-willed. She fell in love with Crates and the philosophical life of a Cynic and never looked back.

When her parents refused: she threatened with suicide.

She won.

She would accompany Crates in public. Attending both lectures and symposiums.

One evening at a party in Lysimachus, Theodorus the Atheist got into a philosophical argument with her. (Another Gorgias?: different, shorter – but public, dialectical.)

She threw this sophism at him: “What Theodorus could not be called wrong for going. But Theodorus does no wrong when he beats himself, therefor Hipparchia does no wrong when she beats Theodorus.”

*Silence*

Unable to come up with a retort, Theodorus felt humiliated. Unable to handle being outwitted by a women, he knew of no other way, except to try to humiliate her — so, he vindictively stripped her of her dress.

However this had the opposite effect. She calmly stood in the room, full of men, stark naked.

“Who is the woman who forsakes her shuttle and loom?” He asked.

She stood with all her womanhood exposed, stripped from the clothes she was suppose to be spending her time making at the loom. She stood there without an ounce of embarrassment.

She states the line that leapt out at me:

“It is I, Theodorus.  But do you imagine that I have not taken proper thought about myself, if the time I might have spent on the loom I have devoted to my education?”

A paragon of Cynic virtue: No shame.

She won.

If she could over come all these obstacles, I certainly can over come mine:

I think about these texts.

I should be brave enough to find something to say:

Her section is embedded in Diogenes’ book on the Cynics.

In that book, these men appear quite absurd.

“Ripley’s believe it or not” of philosophers is the fitting phrase we use.

However, when it comes to Hipparchia’s symposium scene, her portrayal

appears tame in comparison to the rest. I sense a tone of respect, but that’s

probably stemming from a personal desire to feel that.

A second thought:

Maybe the absurdity is implicit in her gender. She doesn’t need to be caricatured to any further degree: a woman practicing philosophy is absurd enough.

I also think about the order of which her biography appears.

Not after Crates.

She is the sister of Metrocles of Maroneia.

Her biography appears after his.

The striking juxtaposition:

After accidently breaking wind in public, Metrocles is mortified to the point of suicide, while Hipparchia stands with her bare-bottom exposed in a room full of men, entirely unfazed.

His weak ability to moderate his feelings of shame, accentuates the strength of hers.

I think about Cynic virtues: Poverty, Apathy, Indifference, Celibacy, Ignorance, Suicide, Shamelessness, Simplicity.

I think about if that’s the way Cynics identified wisdom and how they strove for it.

I think about the fact that women weren’t allowed to own property, (which falls in line perfectly with living a life of a Cynic) and always needed a male guardian (Crates?).  I pour over the letters he wrote her. He writes, “Women are not naturally the weaker sex. Look at the Amazons; they were physically tough as any man” (Dobbin 70). He believed in her: “You certainly won’t persuade me that you are fragile when backs are turned” (Dobbin 70).

I think about the manner in which women’s histories have trickle down from Antiquity to me.

Kakaphony.  Anne Carson words from her essay “The Gender of Sound” rush to my mind: “It is confusing and embarrassing to have two mouths.”  Kakaphony is the sound produced by both of them. “The doubling and interchangeability of mouth engenders a creature in whom sex is cancelled out by sound and sound is cancelled out by sex.” She talks about women in Ancient Greece. I think of Hipparchia. I think of her standing there at the dinner party; both of her two “mouths” exposed. Are her philosophical sounds cancelled out?

The philosopher that challenged Hipparchia, Theodorus the Atheist, was a

Cyrenaic: they were also known as “Mother taught.”

He was taught by Aristippus the younger, who was taught by his mother Arete. A Hedonist. I begin to rethink Theodorus actions. Was he just living out the philosophy of the Cyrenaics: Relativists, using pleasure as the measure for actions? Is this a fictional scene Diogenes (who wrote the only biography of Hipparchia we have from Ancient Greece) constructs to exemplify the difference between these two schools of thought? To show their difference through action?

Diogenes was infatuated with the way philosophers died.

Her death is never mentioned.

Immortal.

***

I like to lift philosophers from their texts.

I entirely decontextualize them.

I bring them to work with me.

Φαρμακεια. Pharmakeia. Pharmacy

I sell drugs at a retail chain.

Mixing magic potions in a mortar with my pestle.  

Most of the Cynics were peasants.

And when I’m clothed in scrubs (the garb of the lowly pharmacy technician)

I am too.

The pharmacy is located inside a hospital. A violation of some anti-trust law, I’m sure. With an experimental location, comes experimental business ventures.

One of them called “Bedside Delivery.” They send me into the Emergency Room to collect business. The title on my business card says I’m a “pharmacy liaison.” But really, it should say prescription drug hustler.

Corporate rhetoricians.

They have me rigorously practicing rhetoric

– excuse me – practicing “proper verbiage.”

While patients are vomiting, bleeding, missing limbs, Etc., I approach them:

“Hi. I’m Melanie. I work at X pharmacy located here, inside the hospital. We now provide bedside delivery to the ER. I could I fill your prescription and deliver it down to you.” Smile. Smile. Smile. Never let it drop.

If the patient accepts, I transform into an Olympian athlete. I run up and down flights of stairs, in a mad dash, to fill their prescriptions.

This program is supposed to help prevent readmission rates, while providing patient convenience. More rhetoric.

Amidst the artificial, I crave something real.

The smell of rubbing alcohol on all the plastic sets my teeth on edge. I’m unable to endure the sterility of the hospital. During this shift, I have to wear a real flower in my hair.

Our “office” is any one of the plastic blue chairs in the waiting room. I sit amongst a sea of patients, patiently waiting. I observe behaviors, quickly categorizing. This Bedside program is unprecedented, strict corporate rules have yet to be codified.

I’m on company time. I take advantage. I read.

The blue chair becomes my own ceramic tub.

But my tub is located amongst the patients moving in and out of this hospital rather than amongst the people walking around the streets of Athens.

A Spectacle.

A person reading. A girl reading.

The patients always stare.

Some asks: “What are you reading?”

I respond: “Do you want to hear about some bad-ass woman philosopher from Ancient Greece?”

Hipparchia.

I luxuriate in her story.

I romanticize, I idealize, I retell.

I retell (mostly to myself).

I retell (to anyone willing to listen).

Nobody cares.

I tell them anyway.

I make them care.

Well, more like make them pretend to care.

It’s all I can do.

A spectacle:

A person reading. A girl reading.

My Love Affair With Creativity: Be Who You Really Are & Never Apologize For It.

Featured

             Creativity is not as hard to harvest as its reputation makes it out to be. It stretches deep, penetrating right down to the inscription in every individuals’ DNA coding. The recipe is simple: just be yourself. The difficult part lies in harvesting the courage to choose to be the individual that you are (quirks & unforgivable parts included). It’s not about playing a game of social hide-and-seek with your own differences, but embracing them. In a society that continually cultivates mimetic practices, belonging, and sameness (even the sameness among differences), it is not surprising that people become shamefully defeated, throwing their gem of individuality under the bed, like a dirty sock, hoping nobody lifts up the bed skirt. Following a similar thread, acting “different,” simply for the sake of being different, falls under the same crime as well. The questions people continually find themselves asking are: “Do I belong or not?,” “Is this good or not?,” “Is this accepted or not?,” “Is this cool/smart/[insert value here] or not?,” rather than: “Is this right for me?,” “Is this something value?,” “Is this something believe?,” “Is this something I envisioned?”. And, most importantly, it’s about not apologizing for your own genuine answers when faced with responding to the latter set of questions. All creativity requires is seeking beyond what culture has already thrown up on you. It requires finding nourishment in whatever sustains, inspires, and moves you. No two eyes ever see exactly the same perspective: the illusion is the sameness not the difference. Don’t cheat yourself out of what you have to offer by living in the shadowy lie of desiring to be/copying someone else. Take up an identity in who you truly are. Genuine creativity is choosing to be you, and what’s more inspiring than that?

Linguistics and Florence + the Machine Album “Lungs”

Featured

This is the chart I created after running all the lyrics from Florence + the Machine’s album “Lungs” through the free version of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count [http://www.liwc.net/tryonline.php]. The numbers are compared to the average numbers you see from personal texts and formal texts. Formal text refers to published material such as books, articles, etc., while personal text refers to things that people have written under instructions in research studies or material abstracted from personal letters, emails or other electronic posts.

What you are looking at:

Continue reading

L’écriture Féminine: Diogenes Laertius and Plato

LivinginaTub-SerifMasthead2Philosophy as a Way of Life.

Philosophy as a Way of Life?

Philosophy as a Way?

Philosophy?

“The unexamined life is not worth living.”

I know this line.

As the socialite of philosophical quotes, it is obliged to show up at every party.

But, this is the first time I’ve actually read this line inside of its own home.

My Apology for that. (And that.)[1]

Naïvely ill-equipped.

The way I am in this class is exactly the way I am in every other:

unscholarly, undisciplined, unlearned, unspoken, unsure.

Vice after Vice.

All things that make for a terrible student in any Academy.

My thoughts are

Brittle,

Always,

Breaking.

Amounting

to piles of

inconsistent

Fragments,

like those ancient scrolls from third century A.D (perhaps? That remains controversial.). Only pieces, of the papyrus rolls that Diogenes Laertius wrote his Lives of the Eminent Philosophers on, survive. I attempt to do for my fragments, what the Renaissance scribe[2] did for Diogenes’. Trying desperately: to piece them together, to translate them, to rescue them, to have them make sense. I don’t know what the word “doxography” means. I look it up: They are all we have left.

What is a philosopher?

I enter the class with only my curiosity and pen.

My curiosity. It never ceases. Always pestering me. Always wanting all my attention. I scold it: “Be Quiet!” If only I could just silence it – once and for all. I would be able to have a 9–5, a “5-year plan,” and 401k, rather than drown in student loan debt. But my curiosity is stubborn. It never gives up its demands. It demands recognition from me. I offer it my warning: A thirst for recognition is what lead Socrates’ infamous student Alcibiades prey to corruption. Corrupt and ugly is the last thing Socrates wanted to become of Alcibiades. It is the last thing I want to become of my curiosity. So I pay it some attention. And, just as the Stoics, I try to transcend all the irrational, illogical panic that arises within my body while I take my seat in our modern-day Socratic Circle.

I lurk awkwardly in the background of the class. Hoping I’m dressed in the proper philosopher’s robe. Hoping that this type of cloak will procure some divine source of invisibility. Hoping if it doesn’t, that I blend in. Hoping that nobody finds out that I really don’t know anything at all.

I read. I read again. And I read again.

I underline, highlight, [rewrite]:

No confidence in my understanding avails.

I live in doubt, perpetually questioning.

But, I leave the class.

Without regret.

Always.

I like to write like this.

Diogenes Laterites’ writing vexed scholars.

I like that too.

Riddled with anachronisms, contradictions, pulled from too many unreliable sources, uneven, flights of fictional fancy and have you read his poetry?

My ears prepped, sticky like flypaper. Ready to catch the snippets of facts flying past them. Collect now. Rearrange later. Nietzsche went out on a scholarly mission in Leipzig: critique Diogenes Laertius’ sources and methods. Only to concluded his research with an affinity for Diogenes work. The deeper he dug, the more kindred he found their philosophical spirits to be.

Diogenes writing— In search of the “who?”

****

Philosophical activity today is not what it used to be. That’s one point Michael Frede drives home in “The Philosopher.” He cautions me about contemporary conceptions of philosophical activity. They turn into fun house mirrors when people hold ancient philosophies up to them.

Distorted images are reflected back.

So, I reorient myself. Before continuing to look at ancient philosophy, I need the horizon of history to guide me. One can’t understand the philosophy of Ancient Greece without first understanding how the ancient Greeks conceptualized philosophy themselves.

Frede takes me back to the birthplace of the word philosopher: Plato’s dialogues.

These dialogues chisel the word philosopher from its vagueness. Whittling away the poets, politicians, and lawgivers from the definition of “a person concerned for wisdom.” Into something more precise:

“Philosophers have a definite conception of philosophy”:

  1. Wisdom overrides any other concern; it transforms one’s life.
  2. The only way to pursue wisdom and become wise is the philosopher’s way.

This definition of the philosopher became fixed, a point of agreement in philosophy from Socrates onward. What was constantly evolving, though, was the way wisdom was identified, if it was sufficient, and how to strive for it.

So, I turn to Plato.

***

While reading Plato’s Gorgias, I kept finding myself fighting this strange yet strong urge of picturing Socrates as a three-year-old child, a child boiling over with curiosity and asking questions ad-nauseum. Much like conversations genuinely had with children, within his onslaught of questions, there would always be remarkable moments of insight: seeing things with fresh eyes, and arranging the world in unusual ways. Mostly, I felt as if his questions were goading me to agree with him just so he could pull the rug from right out under me, similar to the way children get you hold your tongue while saying “I live on a pirate ship,” —except then Socrates would then shame me for cursing.  He was running circles around me, using laces of logic to turn my mind into knots of contradiction.

Is Socrates a rhetorician himself?

He left me taunted and torn between his genuine child-like curiosity and the idea that he’s just possibly the ultimate rhetorician. An idea which is confirmed in Allen’s comment on it, “The Gorgias examines rhetoric and is itself rhetorical, meant to move the human soul by means of words” (190).  The text seems capable of folding in on itself. I’m fascinated by the way Socrates ties those who enter into dialogue with him into knots, and even more how Plato uses Socrates to tie those who enter his text into knots as well.

***

A voice leaps out at me from the page.

I’ve found it written four different ways:

“I have used for the getting of knowledge all the time which, because of my sex, I was supposed to waste at the loom?” — Hipparchia

“But don’t suppose for a moment that I regret the time I spend improving my mind instead of squatting by a loom?” — Hipparchia

“But do you imagine that I have not taken proper thought about myself, If the time I might have spent on the loom I have devoted to my education?” — Hipparchia

“But do I appear to you to have come to a wrong decision, if I devote that time to philosophy, which I otherwise should have spent at the loom?” — Hipparchia

***

Each version, adding up to a spirit I’ve been long overdue to find.

I align myself with her.

I copy these lines, repetitively.

Writing her words everywhere, anywhere there’s space.

But to write about her, using words of my own?

I think back to Frede: Historically contextualize: Conditions for women.

What were they like?

She lived around the fourth-third century BC.

A footnote serves as my own “eternal return” to the inferiority of my sex at that time:

“It was axiomatic in the ancient Greek world that men were superior to women”(19).

Hipparchia renounced a life of wealth and security in order to follow her heart. She refused to live any other kind of life, except the one she wanted. Strong-willed. She fell in love with Crates and the philosophical life of a Cynic and never looked back.

When her parents refused: she threatened with suicide.

She won.

She would accompany Crates in public. Attending both lectures and symposiums.

One evening at a party in Lysimachus, Theodorus the Atheist got into a philosophical argument with her. (Another Gorgias?: different, shorter – but public, dialectical.)

She threw this sophism at him: “What Theodorus could not be called wrong for going. But Theodorus does no wrong when he beats himself, therefor Hipparchia does no wrong when she beats Theodorus.”

*Silence*

Unable to come up with an answer, Theodorus stripped her of her dress. Unable to handle being outwitted by a women, he knew of no other way except to try to humiliate her as much as he feels humiliated.

However this had the opposite effect. She stood in the room full of men, stark naked.

“Who is the woman who forsakes her shuttle and loom?” He asks.

She stood with all her womanhood exposed, stripped from the clothes she was suppose to be spending her time making at the loom. She stood there without an ounce of embarrassment.

She states the line that leapt out of me.

“It is I, Theodorus.  But do you imagine that I have not taken proper thought about myself, if the time I might have spent on the loom I have devoted to my education?”

A paragon of Cynic virtue: No shame.

She won.

If she could over come all these obstacles, I certainly can over come mine:

I think about these texts.

I should be brave enough to find something to say:

Her section is embedded in Diogenes’ book on the Cynics.

In that book, these men appear quite absurd.

“Ripley’s believe it or not” of philosophers is the fitting phrase we use.

However, when it comes Hipparchia’s symposium scene, her portrayal

appears tame in comparison to the rest. I sense a tone of respect, but that’s

probably stemming from a personal desire to feel that.

A second thought:

Maybe the absurdity is implicit in her gender. She doesn’t need to be caricatured to any further degree: a woman practicing philosophy is absurd enough.

I also think about the order of which her biography appears.

Not after Crates.

She is the sister of Metrocles of Maroneia.

Her biography appears after his.

The striking juxtaposition:

After accidently breaking wind in public, Metrocles is mortified to the point of suicide, while Hipparchia stands with her bare-bottom exposed in a room full of men, entirely unfazed.

His weak ability to moderate his feelings of shame, accentuates the strength of hers.

I think about Cynic virtues: Poverty, Apathy, Indifference, Celibacy, Ignorance, Suicide, Shamelessness, Simplicity.

I think about if that’s the way Cynics identified wisdom and how they strove for it.

I think about the fact that women weren’t allowed to own property, (which falls in line perfectly with living a life of a Cynic) and always needed a male guardian (Crates?).  I pour over the letters he wrote her. He writes, “Women are not naturally the weaker sex. Look at the Amazons; they were physically tough as any man” (Dobbin 70). He believed in her: “You certainly won’t persuade me that you are fragile when backs are turned” (Dobbin 70).

I think about the manner in which women’s histories have trickle down from Antiquity to me.

Kakaphony.  Anne Carson words from her essay “The Gender of Sound” rush to my mind: “It is confusing and embarrassing to have two mouths.”  Kakaphony is the sound produced by both of them. “The doubling and interchangeability of mouth engenders a creature in whom sex is cancelled out by sound and sound is cancelled out by sex.” She talks about women in Ancient Greece. I think of Hipparchia. I think of her standing there at the dinner party; both of her two mouths exposed. Are her philosophical sounds cancelled out?

The philosopher that challenged Hipparchia, Theodorus the Atheist, was a

Cyrenaic: Mother taught.

He was taught by Aristippus the younger, who was taught by Arete. A Hedonist. I begin to rethink Theodorus actions. Was he just living out the philosophy of the Cyrenaics: Relativists, using pleasure as the measure for actions? Is this a fictional scene Diogenes constructs to exemplify the difference between these two schools of thought? To show their difference through action?

Diogenes was infatuated with the way philosophers died.

Her death is never mentioned.

Immortal.

***

I like to lift philosophers from their texts.

I entirely decontextualize them.

I bring them to work with me.

Φαρμακεια. Pharmakeia. Pharmacy

I sell drugs at a retail chain.

Mixing magic potions in a mortar with my pestle.  

Most of the Cynics were peasants.

And when I’m clothed in scrubs (the garb of the lowly pharmacy technician)

I am too.

The pharmacy is located inside a hospital. A violation of some anti-trust law, I’m sure. With an experimental location, comes experimental business ventures.

One of them called “Bedside Delivery.” They send me into the Emergency Room to collect business. The title on my business card says I’m a “pharmacy liaison.” But really, it should say prescription drug hustler.

Corporate rhetoricians.

They have me rigorously practicing rhetoric

– excuse me – practicing “proper verbiage.”

While patients are vomiting, bleeding, missing limbs, Etc., I approach them:

“Hi. I’m Melanie. I work at X pharmacy located here, inside the hospital. We now provide bedside delivery to the ER. I could I fill your prescription and deliver it down to you.” Smile. Smile. Smile. Never let it drop.

If the patient accepts, I transform into an Olympian athlete. I run up and down flights of stairs, in a mad dash, to fill their prescriptions.

This program is supposed to help prevent readmission rates, while providing patient convenience. More rhetoric.

Amidst the artificial, I crave something real.

The smell of rubbing alcohol on all the plastic sets my teeth on edge. I’m unable to endure the sterility of the hospital. During this shift, I have to wear a real flower in my hair.

Our “office” is any one of the plastic blue chairs in the waiting room. I sit amongst a sea of patients, patiently waiting. I observe behaviors, quickly categorizing. This Bedside program is unprecedented, strict corporate rules have yet to be codified.

I’m on company time. I take advantage. I read.

The blue chair becomes my own ceramic tub.

But my tub is located amongst the patients moving in and out of this hospital rather than amongst the people walking around the streets of Athens.

A Spectacle.

A person reading. A girl reading.

The patients always stare.

Some asks: “What are you reading?”

I respond: “Do you want to hear about some bad-ass woman philosopher from Ancient Greece?”

Hipparchia.

I luxuriate in her story.

I romanticize, I idealize, I retell.

I retell (mostly to myself).

I retell (to anyone willing to listen).

Nobody cares.

I tell them anyway.

I make them care.

Well, more like make them pretend to care.

It’s all I can do.

A spectacle.

A person reading. A girl reading.

Diogenes the Cynic.

After reading the amusing accounts of him heckling people in the streets of Athens, I feel prompted to heckle people myself. I purposely feed a line to a security officer that I know will get him going. It doesn’t take much, I don’t even finish saying “the Cynic,” before he becomes heated.

He goes off, loudly, on his philosophical diatribe.

The fire is lit. I stand back and watch.

“All people, at their core, are good. They just need to be taught.”

A second security guard takes it upon himself to argue an opposing stance.

“No way, man, people are naturally selfish. They will always put themselves first.”

A poor man’s dialectic unfolds.

An audience forms: an elderly Christian couple waiting for their cab to arrive.

The lobby turns into a forum.

I’m reminded again of Gorgias.

The words “wisdom,” “virtue” and “evil” are tossed around.

All parties become frustrated: especially the audience

“How old are you? I am older than all of you. Therefore I have been alive longer, have seen more than you have, and have more wisdom. I’m telling you: God made people good. ”

The fire blazes.

I silently slip away before anyone can identify me as the arsonist.

***

Now that I have been nourished by these texts

When can I call myself “educated?”

Am I capable of ever being “educated?”

To better understand what it mean to write about one what one reads.

To over come the intimidation of these texts.

To overcome these fragments, my uneven thoughts, inconsistencies.

I leave the class with much more than I entered:

More questions.

More uncertain.

More confused.


1 “That” being my corniness.

2 “If now we turn from printed copies to older sources of the text, there are numerous MSS., but none very old or trustworthy. By far the best is Codex Borbonicus (B) of the National Library at Naples : Gr. III. B 29 is the class-mark. This MS. is dated about A.D. 1200. The scribe obviously knew no Greek ; itacisms abound—there are some 150 instances in Book III. alone. Breathings and accents are sometimes omitted; words are sometimes wrongly divided, especially in citations of poetry ; yet the spelling of certain words is unusually good. In a recent edition of Book III. (Vita Platonis) the editors give (p. iv) thirty examples of bad readings, some of which suggest conjectural emendation. Nevertheless all critics agree that B is the most faithful to the archetype.”(Source: R.D. Hicks, Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosphers. In 2 vols.  Loeb: 1925.)

Confessions of a Teenage Pill Pusher from “Nacirema”

“Like pharmacists, doctor’s handwriting, and prescriptions,” I scribbled hastily in the margins of my Bedford Reader, next to the sentence “this writing is understood only by the medicine men and the herbalists who, for another gift, provide the require charm.” I was behind on my homework and spent any free moment at work secretly reading an assignment due the next day for English.

It was an essay entitled “Body Rituals of the Nacirema,” an anthropological piece documenting the strange cultural rituals of the Nacirema tribe. I read it quickly, in between filling scripts, only making annotations about “herbalists.” The language used to describe the “herbalist” seemed all too familiar. Near the phrase, “the real or imagined maladies of the people are many,” I jotted, “like the crazy patients I encounter every day at this job!”

I was indoctrinated into the world of corporate medicine at the age of 16. After school, during the prime hours when kids are most susceptible to get involved with drugs, a corporate drugstore chain hired me as a part-time pharmacy technician. The money seemed easy and the reputation respectable. But from the minute you punched your numbers into the time clock, the company owned you, and they made sure you knew it.

This pharmacy was where my understanding of the “real world” was built. It was constructed with the building blocks of unquestioned authority, cemented together with servility, and governed by corporate decrees which were handed down by feared executives. Every decree was dressed-up with an altruistic motive of making a difference in the customers’ lives, but as time went on, I was devastated by the naked truths I uncovered.

The pharmacy employees and drugs were contained within an enclosed area, like animals in a pen at a petting zoo. The counter created the line of division, separating employees from customers. But after working there for a while, it wasn’t clear on which side of the counter the animals trapped in this zoo were kept. We were both fed two different forms of the same corporate slop, paychecks and pills, and we were both willingly lapping it up. In the end, the pen may as well have been the walls of the entire store, since we were all being fattened up for a more profitable use.

The company was helpful: they told me that I had to take my breaks and proceeded to take them out of my pay whether the pharmacist actually let me take them or not – breaks were a luxury you weren’t always awarded. Their mantra was “Promote patient wellness,” yet my job was to take money from the elderly population in exchange for medicine regardless of need or cost.

Two more mantras were constantly echoed across the counter: from the customers “Never get old, kid” and from the pharmacists “People are just crazy.” It all seemed crazy and I certainly didn’t think I was helping anyone, but I thought that’s how adulthood was: miserable and hopeless. Everyone told me that I needed time to develop a tougher skin to get used to it.

This became my standard for normal. I filled scripts rapidly, never dropped my smile, never asked questions, and always put the corporation first.

The next day, when my teacher revealed in class that the essay described the body rituals of Americans, “Nacerima” backwards, that I discovered the words “herbalists” and “charms” were indeed describing pharmacists and prescriptions.  I myself was an herbalist! Language had deceived me. My job never looked the same after I learned the power of fiction to reveal or conceal profound truths about the nature of things.  “Normal” isn’t always positive, authority isn’t a singular perspective, and often things appear different than they are.  I never learned those valuable lessons from being out in the “real world.” I learned them sitting in school and discussing literature.

The world of fiction continued to reveal more truths about the “real world.” When I read 1984, every minute I spent in the pharmacy felt like I was in Winston Smith’s shoes working for the Ministry of Truth, hating the Party and committing thought crimes. The movie Requiem for a Dream gave me a better understanding than any corporate handout ever had of the minds of junkies, more insight into the confusion of the elderly when it came to managing their own prescriptions.  As I have grown in the corporation, so has my rebellion.

Since that first revelation that unraveled truths about everyday rituals in America, the fiction I’ve read has unraveled more truths about the “real world,” while the “real world” revealed more fictions. Seven years and a terrible economy later, I’m still chained to selling corporate slop to pay for my education, but now when corporate pours on more responsibilities, I fight for higher wages. When patients come without insurance, I direct them where they can find their medicine at cheaper prices. When patients are confused, I spend time actually helping them. And I always take my break.

Injecting Life into Dead Matter

Image

The emergency room is naturally the most drab place in the world, a container of people projectile vomiting toxins from their body, miserable, bloody, and teary eyed —- most in excruciating pain. So on the days I’m forced to go sell medicine down there, I liven it up by growing real spotted orchids and butterfly weeds in my hair. It is something I started for the sole purpose of bringing *life* into the ER, along with happiness. The flowers pierce the plastic, sterile, and artificial environment, with a sense of vitality — a kind of vitality that only nature can instill. Strangers, who from a distance appear hard and coarse, will always melt their tense mouths into a smile or breathe out their worries with a warm hello at the first site of the flowers. People are powerless to the life intertwined in the dead matter of my hair. One of the most interesting phenomena that has occurred in this life self-experiment is the reciprocation I have experienced. Not only will the gift shop will save flowers for me that might have gone in the trash, but people will bring flowers in from their own personal gardens for me to feature in my hair.  If the corporate world were more in tuned with the psychological effects of nature, I’m sure they’d market the selling power of flowers in their employees’ hair until it was stripped dead into a required uniform. But for now, while it remains my little project of sprucing of my scrubs with petals, I’m loving every smile I collect and every atom of happiness the flowers sprouting from my hair create.